Pretty cool documentary about Phish I got from Google. Just thought people who haven't watched might enjoy it. Enjoy!
Woah they have the entire thing on Google? I mean I have my own DVD of it but you would think there would be copyright issues of some kind. Pretty fun film though.Yeah, I was surprised about this too when I saw that it was one there a couple months ago.
Dudes, this documentary is out to get the band and make 'em look bad. Especially Trey. To the casual music fan, this film is absolutely designed to make Phish look incredibly egotistical with a fan base that doesn't appreciate quality music. I can't say I'm a fan. Watch it, though.agree and disagree. The Documentary doesn't make the band look great, and definitely depicts the fans poorly too. BUT, i don't think that Todd Phillips had that intent. I believe it was Phish's idea to film the documentary and they purposefully brought in someone who wasn't a phan so it would have some objectivity. They wanted to explain phish to people who had never heard of em. I don't know that there is any part that makes them look egotistical....confident sure, but not cocky. I mean Trey sits there and reads bad reviews about themselves while laughing about it. There really is limited interaction with any of the other members (which is dissapointing), but there are some humorous parts as well as some decent musical clips. Cant believe dude was touring with the boys in 97 and couldn't dig up some better musical clips.
Anyways, definitely some shitty messages put out because of the documentary but for fans its actually laughable.
@TheDeerman said:I always thought that it was pretty bogus when they were cutting everybody's heads off in the pictures. I would be pretty excited to be able to get a picture with them. And then get the pictures developed and no one has a head. Thank god for digital cameras. Those sneaky bastards won't trick me when the day arrives.Dudes, this documentary is out to get the band and make 'em look bad. Especially Trey. To the casual music fan, this film is absolutely designed to make Phish look incredibly egotistical with a fan base that doesn't appreciate quality music. I can't say I'm a fan. Watch it, though.agree and disagree. The Documentary doesn't make the band look great, and definitely depicts the fans poorly too. BUT, i don't think that Todd Phillips had that intent. I believe it was Phish's idea to film the documentary and they purposefully brought in someone who wasn't a phan so it would have some objectivity. They wanted to explain phish to people who had never heard of em. I don't know that there is any part that makes them look egotistical....confident sure, but not cocky. I mean Trey sits there and reads bad reviews about themselves while laughing about it. There really is limited interaction with any of the other members (which is dissapointing), but there are some humorous parts as well as some decent musical clips. Cant believe dude was touring with the boys in 97 and couldn't dig up some better musical clips.
Anyways, definitely some shitty messages put out because of the documentary but for fans its actually laughable.
And think of all the footage that exists that wasn't in the film, maybe that will surface someday too. :fingers crossed:
Hope you're right. I just feel like (1) taking shots before going onstage (2) Trey negotiating with the store clerk for the guns (3) The Dave fans in the tent (4) the drug dealers, and (5) the naked photo shoot bring way too much of a negative vibe for the band that does not overcome the funny parts to the non-phan. I still enjoyed it, but I wouldn't recommend this to someone trying to convert a noob. Just my $.02
And think of all the footage that exists that wasn't in the film, maybe that will surface someday too. :fingers crossed:
Trey bartering at the weapon store was comical, and how does the naked photo shoot bring negative vibes?
what drug dealers?
Trey bartering at the weapon store was comical, and how does the naked photo shoot bring negative vibes?
You gotta look at this from the perspective of someone who doesn't know the scene at all. Of course it's funny to us, but to anyone who doesn't know who Trey is, he looks like an asshole. There's a guy who they interview that sells weed to stay on tour. The way they show the fans makes us look like we're all hippies/wookies/bros. Maybe that's the prominent image put out there, but that is definitely not the "average" phan.
Though I do have to admit that I didn't know the scene in '97. Maybe that's how it was? Still, I would guess not.
I signed up for a free trial of NetFlix to stream it, only to learn that it is only available on their (antiquated) "DVD by mail" service. Blah!
Let the rabbits wear glasses!
(3) The Dave fans in the tentthat whole bit about VW's and girls with hairy armpits was just weird
This is the good shit.No argument with this, or with your earlier post. I was just naming one of the most memorable parts of the movie (for me). Besides letting us get to know the band, I think "Bittersweet Motel" does a fine job of illustrating some of the different attributes vs. preconceptions of Phish fans. There are likely more than a few guys who go see Phish because they believe that girls like the blonde nitrous huffer will be there.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xjloX_EvYiI
Good thread. I'm surprised how many vets hate on this film. I don't think it portrays fans negatively, just in the colorful light an outsider would see. (They even found a guy who said you don't need drugs to enjoy Phish! How many of those were on tour in '97?!) Trey has some absolutely priceless quotes in it and yes, the band come off as dicks sometimes, but I doubt that's inaccurate. Too bad there isn't more music, but it's great to be able to see some of the scene @ that moment in time.
The streaming versions ARE copyright infringements and keep getting taken down. I finally caved and spent 5$ on the DVD.. now I"ll probably never want to watch it again.
The streaming versions ARE copyright infringements and keep getting taken down. I finally caved and spent 5$ on the DVD.. now I"ll probably never want to watch it again.
The boys were trolling.
...Weren't they?? //gets nervous, questions evertything\\
(But seriously. My brother met Trey at an Indian's game, Trey saw how crazy excited/nervous my brudda was and so he initiated the hug, smiled and walked away. Can you imagine someone asking for a picture with Page pre-digital and Page allowing them to cut his head off? I love the movie because it's hysterically divergent from my view of the boys, with some truths and untruths I'm sure, but they are showmakers and love fugggin with the fans, so relax, take it easy. in the end, they're human. And funny. And sometimes douchers, like all of us)
Nobody mentioned Trey calling Brad a tool? That was it for me, honestly. I took a long break from Phish after that. No kidding.I don't know if you are being sarcastic or not but Trey wasn't being an asshole he was just f***ing with Brad. In the clip before that scene Trey is in his hotel room and is asked by the cameraman if he had heard what someone said about a song they played the night before, Trey said no and the cameraman told him the person said the song was ruined or botched because they missed a change. Trey replied with that he could give a f*** if they missed a change and that he thought the whole night was quote "rockin'" The person who made that comment was Brad Sands. So that's why the next day Trey, half-jokingly, said kiss my ass you fckin tool and threw a beer can at him. He was pissed that Brad would care that they missed a change. It was not meant to be cruel, friends f*** with friends all the time, doesn't mean it doesn't happen in Phish.
some of the comments in this thread have left me scratching my head. Maybe the footage in Bittersweet doesnt translate as well now as it did when it came out?
@TheDeerman said:
(2) Trey negotiating with the store clerk for the guns ... bring way too much of a negative vibe for the band that does not overcome the funny parts to the non-phan.Bar none, my favorite scene in the whole movie.
Also love during the NYE stuff when they show a clip of a group of peeps from St. Stephen NB Canada ... don't know em, but it's pretty handy to where I grew up ... very cool!
And how does anyone not love watching Trey slay the Went Simple.
Within a week of that, I read a review in a local alternative paper that attacked the film unfairly, making jokes in poor taste without actually offering a valid critique. The review commented about Phish fans being predominantly white, but the wording was borderline racist. When I saw the film a few weeks later, the comment made perfect sense after seeing the whole naked-on-the-runway scene (although the review was still in bad taste and without merit).
Anyway, my brother got a ticket and we missed the show, but at least the woman was ok and took a cab home. Funny thing is, I work for that bookstore now, and I can occasionally afford a new shirt for the girls in the front row/aisle/bumper.
The GD Movie that Jerry himself directed and edited left in the scenes with the concession stand vendor who doesn't like loud music, the drug use and the weirdness of the spun out fans. Some people would be turned off by some of those choices but I love it. It gives you the real feel of what those whows were like.
Another example is the Band's Last Waltz movie that has Neil Young with a giant boulder of white hanging out of his nose as he sings Helpless. Scorsese showed it all didn't hold back.
For these reasons I love B. Motel. I think it is hilarious but also bittersweet during some scenes, and I cringe when they show the tweaked out Trey talking to the other guys when he is clearly flying at the edge of space beyond the troposhere or whatever.
The IT doc is a much more of a 'show the band in the best light' type of a thing, imo..
Another example is the Band's Last Waltz movie that has Neil Young with a giant boulder of white hanging out of his nose as he sings Helpless. Scorsese showed it all didn't hold back.
"The infamous cocaine drop hanging from Neil Young's left nostril was airbrushed out by Martin Scorsese. "
Dudes, this documentary is out to get the band and make 'em look bad. Especially Trey. To the casual music fan, this film is absolutely designed to make Phish look incredibly egotistical with a fan base that doesn't appreciate quality music. I can't say I'm a fan. Watch it, though.I don't think so. I thought it was fair and balanced.
Either way I have learned to separate my favorite artists and what they do on the stage from who they are when not performing. It simply doesn't matter (to me) what they say and do if they can go on stage and put on a good show.
With that being said, I always disliked the video.
It is what is it. At this point, it is water under the bridge. They were young guys having fun and maybe they did make asses of themselves. But...they have certainly changed and adopted a more humble, adult approach.I wonder what the band thinks of the movie now.
My daughter likes to throw on old home movies we have of our family when we were all younger. My wife and I cringe because we seem like such idiots. We were very young parents and it shows when we see videos of ourselves from during that time. But, it is what it is and our kids have turned out pretty good regardless.
I recently re-watched the DVD and came away with a much more positive perspective on the film. I mainly attribute that to the fact that I had grown up quite a bit myself and I also knew alot more about the history of Phish and the struggles they had with their backstage scene. The musical parts seemed a lot better to me as well.
bittersweet motel was ok. i found the band interviews to be the best part...the "what's the biggest misconception about mike gordon" question was priceless.
the live footage could be better, but you cant expect a non phan to recignize the top jams of '97.
the fan footage painted some in negative light, but honestly the festival crowd is full of overdrugged wooks, so what do you expect?
i'd like to see a new documentary with a sober band and grown up fanbase.
the live footage could be better, but you cant expect a non phan to recignize the top jams of '97.
the fan footage painted some in negative light, but honestly the festival crowd is full of overdrugged wooks, so what do you expect?
i'd like to see a new documentary with a sober band and grown up fanbase.
This is the band that f*cked everyone over who flew to Vegas in 98 to see Dark Side, by playing it the next night. I remember a lot of peeps who shelled out major $$$ and were piiiiiiiissssed off.
This is the band that teases 2001 for three minutes when they have to play an 'A' tune in an out of this world show, and then they play Alaska.
This band has been Lucy to our Charlie Brown for decades. I would have been disappointed if they hadn't cut the heads off in those pictures.
This movie is fun and people need to get over it.
"Sir!!! 10,000, sir!!"
Being completely objective, it's not THAT far off in terms of the fanbase from around that time. There were a LOT of spaced out wooks and wasted frat boys at the shows.
I loved the scenes of the band practicing and warming up Roses; and I really loved the whole festival montage. Can only imagine that chaos as the deadline was closing in and there was still a ton of work to get done.
This band has been Lucy to our Charlie Brown for decades. I would have been disappointed if they hadn't cut the heads off in those pictures.This is a great analogy, and one of the best lines of criticism I have read on this forum in at least 2 months. +100.
You must be logged in to leave a comment!

Back to Forum
Oldest First
Newest First