So, why are vocals so important to people? I’m sure some people are familiar with the David Byrne quote “Singing is a trick to get people to listen to music for longer than they would ordinarily.” Is instrumental music really that boring to people that they need someone singing over it in order to enjoy it? Do most people enjoy music because of the lyrical content and couldn’t care less about the instrumental parts (as long as it has a few catchy hooks)? Perhaps it’s much easier for the average listener to pick up on and follow lyrical themes rather than musical themes.
I used to be into Rush pretty heavily and would hear similar criticisms of their music. Geddy Lee’s voice is not the greatest (especially on the earlier albums), and that seemed to be a deal breaker to most people within the first 20 seconds hearing a Rush song. I always found it totally effortless to get past his voice, because the music is so good. For whatever reason, I’m way more interested in instrumental parts of songs than vocal parts. It seems like most people are the other way around, and I cannot figure out why.
(For the record, I don't agree that Phish's lyrics are meaningless or that Trey is a bad singer. He's certainly not a vocal genius, but I enjoy his voice just fine).
Is instrumental music really that boring to people that they need someone singing over it in order to enjoy it?Yes.
@chris200w said:To the simple minded folk.Is instrumental music really that boring to people that they need someone singing over it in order to enjoy it?Yes.
But driving down to spring break one year ('95 or '96) packed 4 in a little car, probably a 15 hour drive, troll'd listening to everyone's crappy music. Eventually I slip in a phish tape, and after less than 15 minutes, one of the guys says, "I'm sorry, but can we please listen to something else? Just anything with words...?"
I could hear the stress in his voice, it was really driving him nuts. No idea why. I guess it is a little hectic and unpredictable and thus potentially disorienting or overwhelming compared to 4-chord pop.
@Capricornio said:To most people on the planet.@chris200w said:To the simple minded folk.Is instrumental music really that boring to people that they need someone singing over it in order to enjoy it?Yes.
I could hear the stress in his voice, it was really driving him nuts. No idea why. I guess it is a little hectic and unpredictable and thus potentially disorienting or overwhelming compared to 4-chord pop.I have seen this discomfort in many people. It is caused by the tension and release element of a lot of Phish's music. To those of us that get it this is part of what set Phish apart. They build crazy tension and build and build and build until they finally resolve it (the reease) and it feels so good. I think the general public just doesn't have the patients to stick around for the release. This is also my issue with the general public and music in general. They need their hook within 5 seconds of the song starting or else they don't like it. I see it all the time in the bar business. It is sad really. Not to get too deep into this, but I also think that is a major flaw in modern society. People have forgotten patients. We need everything and we need it now. They don't realize how much better that hook is going to sound and feel if they wait for it.
Patients is a virtue my friends. Go remind someone
Their vocals sound great these days. The lyrics always have a purpose. It's just that it isn't obvious to people who can barely listen to music, or choose to dig deeper into it. You have to think about the music, as well as hear it. And re-listen, etc...not for lazy folks!This is true too, their vocals in 2011 really were blowing me away. Really nailing it.
@landladylover said:Dicks was the smoothest vocal performance of last yearTheir vocals sound great these days. The lyrics always have a purpose. It's just that it isn't obvious to people who can barely listen to music, or choose to dig deeper into it. You have to think about the music, as well as hear it. And re-listen, etc...not for lazy folks!This is true too, their vocals in 2011 really were blowing me away. Really nailing it.
Can't wait to hear them again on Leg 2. It seems to get better as they go...Perhaps it's much easier for the average listener to pick up on and follow lyrical themes rather than musical themes.I think you've answered your own question -- most people communicate with words. It's easier to relate to lyrics when it comes to the feelings/emotions expressed in music. You hear a musician sing "I'm sad" and you immediately understand what he means as opposed to, say, Trey playing a D minor.
Nigel Tufnel: "It's part of a trilogy, a musical trilogy I'm working on in D minor which is the saddest of all keys, I find. People weep instantly when they hear it, and I don't know why."
When ever some one starts rambling off Phish Sterotypes to me I do the same thing to something they are into. This usually proves my point. It's not for everyone.
We're like licorice. Not everybody likes licorice, but the people who like licorice really like licorice. -Jerry Garcia
I cant answer your question.This is my life.
But driving down to spring break one year ('95 or '96) packed 4 in a little car, probably a 15 hour drive, troll'd listening to everyone's crappy music. Eventually I slip in a phish tape, and after less than 15 minutes, one of the guys says, "I'm sorry, but can we please listen to something else? Just anything with words...?"
I could hear the stress in his voice, it was really driving him nuts. No idea why. I guess it is a little hectic and unpredictable and thus potentially disorienting or overwhelming compared to 4-chord pop.
@johnnyd said:Patients are not typically a virtue...I could hear the stress in his voice, it was really driving him nuts. No idea why. I guess it is a little hectic and unpredictable and thus potentially disorienting or overwhelming compared to 4-chord pop.I have seen this discomfort in many people. It is caused by the tension and release element of a lot of Phish's music. To those of us that get it this is part of what set Phish apart. They build crazy tension and build and build and build until they finally resolve it (the reease) and it feels so good. I think the general public just doesn't have the patients to stick around for the release. This is also my issue with the general public and music in general. They need their hook within 5 seconds of the song starting or else they don't like it. I see it all the time in the bar business. It is sad really. Not to get too deep into this, but I also think that is a major flaw in modern society. People have forgotten patients. We need everything and we need it now. They don't realize how much better that hook is going to sound and feel if they wait for it.
Patients is a virtue my friends. Go remind someone![]()
Patience, however, is a virtue.
Dealing with those who can not grasp the concept of homonyms requires patience.
@Jimmymac03 said:Well thank you for being so patient with me. God I feel like an ass. You guys are so smart with your proper word formations and usages.@johnnyd said:Patients are not typically a virtue...I could hear the stress in his voice, it was really driving him nuts. No idea why. I guess it is a little hectic and unpredictable and thus potentially disorienting or overwhelming compared to 4-chord pop.I have seen this discomfort in many people. It is caused by the tension and release element of a lot of Phish's music. To those of us that get it this is part of what set Phish apart. They build crazy tension and build and build and build until they finally resolve it (the reease) and it feels so good. I think the general public just doesn't have the patients to stick around for the release. This is also my issue with the general public and music in general. They need their hook within 5 seconds of the song starting or else they don't like it. I see it all the time in the bar business. It is sad really. Not to get too deep into this, but I also think that is a major flaw in modern society. People have forgotten patients. We need everything and we need it now. They don't realize how much better that hook is going to sound and feel if they wait for it.
Patients is a virtue my friends. Go remind someone![]()
Patience, however, is a virtue.
Dealing with those who can not grasp the concept of homonyms requires patience.
@Sativar said:You have made me more virtuous... or condescending, depending on your point of view. I typically let that stuff go, but this one was so good, I had to bite on it.@Jimmymac03 said:Well thank you for being so patient with me. God I feel like an ass. You guys are so smart with your proper word formations and usages.@johnnyd said:Patients are not typically a virtue...I could hear the stress in his voice, it was really driving him nuts. No idea why. I guess it is a little hectic and unpredictable and thus potentially disorienting or overwhelming compared to 4-chord pop.I have seen this discomfort in many people. It is caused by the tension and release element of a lot of Phish's music. To those of us that get it this is part of what set Phish apart. They build crazy tension and build and build and build until they finally resolve it (the reease) and it feels so good. I think the general public just doesn't have the patients to stick around for the release. This is also my issue with the general public and music in general. They need their hook within 5 seconds of the song starting or else they don't like it. I see it all the time in the bar business. It is sad really. Not to get too deep into this, but I also think that is a major flaw in modern society. People have forgotten patients. We need everything and we need it now. They don't realize how much better that hook is going to sound and feel if they wait for it.
Patients is a virtue my friends. Go remind someone![]()
Patience, however, is a virtue.
Dealing with those who can not grasp the concept of homonyms requires patience.
The best one I have come across was from a Facebook "friend" who I keep around simply for the laughs that her University of Phoenix education provides.
Her post was something along the lines of "Some people really need to look up the definition of morels [sic] in the dictionary..." Blah, blah blah - indiscretion, foul language, etc... She continued to rant about looking up morels [sic] in the dictionary.
If she had heeded her own advice, she would have realized that morels are amazingly tasty mushrooms which are extremely difficult to farm, and as a result typically can only be obtained via foraging.
/threadjack
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I love Phish vocals! Emotional Rescue this summer FTW!!!
I cant answer your question.SO. TRUE. Happens to me all the time. To be honest, I used to be like that too. Before I found the Dead. But know that I've been converted, it's hard to look back.
But driving down to spring break one year ('95 or '96) packed 4 in a little car, probably a 15 hour drive, troll'd listening to everyone's crappy music. Eventually I slip in a phish tape, and after less than 15 minutes, one of the guys says, "I'm sorry, but can we please listen to something else? Just anything with words...?"
I could hear the stress in his voice, it was really driving him nuts. No idea why. I guess it is a little hectic and unpredictable and thus potentially disorienting or overwhelming compared to 4-chord pop.
I think many people can agree with me that listening to the radio these days is incredibly boring, you realize how similar all the songs are, and all the good ones fly by at 3:00 long. It reminds me, I was playing the Doors with someone in my car, and I put on The End. It's 12:00 long. My friend said "Holy Crap! This is such a long song! Who would have the time to listen to this all the way through?"
That's why people don't like Phish. It's hard for people to see past their prejudices about the music. Because it's so different, when they listen, they listen for the things that they think they don't like (Few vocals, weird words, long instrumentals). When they find what they're looking for, they say they hate it.
@Jimmymac03 said:That commint was the epidamy of pretenshisness. Your pretty rude.@johnnyd said:Patients are not typically a virtue...I could hear the stress in his voice, it was really driving him nuts. No idea why. I guess it is a little hectic and unpredictable and thus potentially disorienting or overwhelming compared to 4-chord pop.I have seen this discomfort in many people. It is caused by the tension and release element of a lot of Phish's music. To those of us that get it this is part of what set Phish apart. They build crazy tension and build and build and build until they finally resolve it (the reease) and it feels so good. I think the general public just doesn't have the patients to stick around for the release. This is also my issue with the general public and music in general. They need their hook within 5 seconds of the song starting or else they don't like it. I see it all the time in the bar business. It is sad really. Not to get too deep into this, but I also think that is a major flaw in modern society. People have forgotten patients. We need everything and we need it now. They don't realize how much better that hook is going to sound and feel if they wait for it.
Patients is a virtue my friends. Go remind someone![]()
Patience, however, is a virtue.
Dealing with those who can not grasp the concept of homonyms requires patience.
@Sativar said:I really hope this is a f***ing joke.@Jimmymac03 said:That commint was the epidamy of pretenshisness. Your pretty rude.@johnnyd said:Patients are not typically a virtue...I could hear the stress in his voice, it was really driving him nuts. No idea why. I guess it is a little hectic and unpredictable and thus potentially disorienting or overwhelming compared to 4-chord pop.I have seen this discomfort in many people. It is caused by the tension and release element of a lot of Phish's music. To those of us that get it this is part of what set Phish apart. They build crazy tension and build and build and build until they finally resolve it (the reease) and it feels so good. I think the general public just doesn't have the patients to stick around for the release. This is also my issue with the general public and music in general. They need their hook within 5 seconds of the song starting or else they don't like it. I see it all the time in the bar business. It is sad really. Not to get too deep into this, but I also think that is a major flaw in modern society. People have forgotten patients. We need everything and we need it now. They don't realize how much better that hook is going to sound and feel if they wait for it.
Patients is a virtue my friends. Go remind someone![]()
Patience, however, is a virtue.
Dealing with those who can not grasp the concept of homonyms requires patience.
You misspelled "comment;" "epidamy," while I can figure out what it means from context, isn't a real word; you misspelled "pretentiousness;" and misused the homonym "you're."
If I am rude, then you are straight stupid.
@Sativar said:@Jimmymac03 said:That commint was the epidamy of pretenshisness. Your pretty rude.@johnnyd said:Patients are not typically a virtue...I could hear the stress in his voice, it was really driving him nuts. No idea why. I guess it is a little hectic and unpredictable and thus potentially disorienting or overwhelming compared to 4-chord pop.I have seen this discomfort in many people. It is caused by the tension and release element of a lot of Phish's music. To those of us that get it this is part of what set Phish apart. They build crazy tension and build and build and build until they finally resolve it (the reease) and it feels so good. I think the general public just doesn't have the patients to stick around for the release. This is also my issue with the general public and music in general. They need their hook within 5 seconds of the song starting or else they don't like it. I see it all the time in the bar business. It is sad really. Not to get too deep into this, but I also think that is a major flaw in modern society. People have forgotten patients. We need everything and we need it now. They don't realize how much better that hook is going to sound and feel if they wait for it.
Patients is a virtue my friends. Go remind someone![]()
Patience, however, is a virtue.
Dealing with those who can not grasp the concept of homonyms requires patience.
lol
That being said, there are times where I am entranced by a groove or a jam or whatever, and others are bored or feel the need to change the song.
I don't really have a strong opinion on which is "better" (lyrics or instrumentals?) but feel like starting to listen to Phish a few years ago was one of the best things that ever happened to me. With almost anything I listen to (or am forced to listen to, with the exception of heavy electronic dance stuff, "manufactured music" as I call it because it's entirely produced by machines) I can hear something good in it. I don't like pop country music (the vocals really irritate me and come off as fake/trying too hard most of the time) but I can totally dig the steel guitars and banjos behind it.
Listening to lots of Phish jams - especially the long type II's - somehow taught me to have more patience with instrumentals, to allow them to develop better. A jam doesn't have to be crazy shredding the whole time (like with AC/DC, Van Halen, or other heavy stuff) as I thought before I started listening to them. It doesn't have to
I find Phish's jams to be so timeless and constantly enticing because they're given the time to develop, hit peaks and troughs, repeat a melody for a few measures, quiet down, get loud, switch to a minor key, switch to a major key, move into a funky groove, get distorted, get dissonant, infuse electronics, infuse vocals, tease other songs, give prominence to the bass/keys/guitar/percussion/horns....you really just never know. They're always interesting to me.
Consequently, this exposure just opened my mind to a wealth of genres, subgenres, etc. To name a few artists they turned me onto over the past few years: Bob Dylan, Grateful Dead, Neil Young, Miles Davis, Neutral Milk Hotel, Traffic, Bela Fleck & Flecktones, Wilco, The Band, Greyboy Allstars, Herbie Hancock, Galactic, Mofro, Railroad Earth, MMJ, Pavement...oh my gosh, the list goes on. And I also started checking out more of the complete works of some of my previous favorite artists, getting past those 10 songs they play on the radio.
Spread the word. Give your friends a dose of Phish, and good things will happen.
I just love how Phish doesnt emphasize lyrics and/or singing. It doesnt mean they cant. Page's voice is majestic and so is the combination of trey and mike. Trey and Tom's lyrics are so much more meaningful than the "common" lyric, which makes the vocal sections of their songs that much better. But then again, without the emphasis on singing, it makes the instrumental all the more satisfying. As an example: Went Gin. Trey forgets the lyrics of the first line, and it always makes me chuckle, only because I know he doesnt give a shit about missing lyrics when he's about to formulate one of the best Phish jams in history.
@CannedWalrus said:
That commint was the epidamy of pretenshisness. Your pretty rude.Dam strait! Serves him right for making that add homonym attack!
@johnnyd said:alas, mine too. and my friends can listen to repetitive 3 minute pop/rap songs that often have horrendously simple and annoying backing beats but at they have some (often simple and annoying) lyrics on top.I cant answer your question.This is my life.
But driving down to spring break one year ('95 or '96) packed 4 in a little car, probably a 15 hour drive, troll'd listening to everyone's crappy music. Eventually I slip in a phish tape, and after less than 15 minutes, one of the guys says, "I'm sorry, but can we please listen to something else? Just anything with words...?"
I could hear the stress in his voice, it was really driving him nuts. No idea why. I guess it is a little hectic and unpredictable and thus potentially disorienting or overwhelming compared to 4-chord pop.
I think this fixation on vocals is visible in the larger public as well. shows like American idol, the x factor, the voice all idolize singers. The ability to sing an already popular tune is the peak of musical virtuosity for the American public these days; the other musicians are not mentioned and kept in the shadows behind while the vocalists revels in the glory. Most popular music acts are simply the name of the singer, for instance "Carrie Underwood", when in reality she is probably not writing her songs and definitely not composing the music or playing the instruments. She sings, and damn well, but this is apparently all that people can handle.
As soon as people's close-minded concepts of enjoyable music get challenged (it is to my everlasting sorrow that someone could hate Harry Hood) they lash out against the music that is not keeping to the electropop dance beat, verse verse refrain verse refrain middle 8 refrain paradigm
I think that lyrics and singing do matter, quite a lot.
I sort of understand why Phish's lyrics are criticized. The early songs have a lot of senseless and silly words in them. On the other hand, Trey has always been aware of the special way that the words can shape the music. Not just the meaning of the words, but their sound and syllables. Just think of the lyrics from Lizards or Colonel Forbin's Ascent. They might not be deep and meaningful, but the words were specially chosen for the way they fit with the music. This has continued and expanded with Tom Marshall's lyrics. In my opinion, there are relatively few artists who capture this aspect as well as Phish. You have to look to guys like Paul Simon, Bob Dylan, Bruce Springsteen, etc. I'm not saying that Phish's lyrics are as meaningful as those guys, but the words themselves are as well chosen and carefully placed. With this in mind, I would say that the lyrics in Phish songs are actually above average quality.
What do people consider to be good when they say Phish has bad lyrics? I sincerely want to know.
As far as singing, well, this is the glaring weakness of Phish. They've become somewhat better singers over the years (Didn't Trey take vocal lessons around the time of the 3.0 reunion?). Still, at best they are average singers amongst the 'real world', and well below average for nationally known acts. But, even if they were strong singers, I doubt that they would be much more accessible. The phans would appreciate that aspect of their perfomances, but it wouldn't change the structure of their songs and shows or the philosophy of the band. Maybe they would have had a few minor mainstream hits, but overall I don't think it would change much about the perception of the band.
I sort of understand why Phish's lyrics are criticized. The early songs have a lot of senseless and silly words in them. On the other hand, Trey has always been aware of the special way that the words can shape the music. Not just the meaning of the words, but their sound and syllables. Just think of the lyrics from Lizards or Colonel Forbin's Ascent. They might not be deep and meaningful, but the words were specially chosen for the way they fit with the music. This has continued and expanded with Tom Marshall's lyrics. In my opinion, there are relatively few artists who capture this aspect as well as Phish. You have to look to guys like Paul Simon, Bob Dylan, Bruce Springsteen, etc. I'm not saying that Phish's lyrics are as meaningful as those guys, but the words themselves are as well chosen and carefully placed. With this in mind, I would say that the lyrics in Phish songs are actually above average quality.
What do people consider to be good when they say Phish has bad lyrics? I sincerely want to know.
As far as singing, well, this is the glaring weakness of Phish. They've become somewhat better singers over the years (Didn't Trey take vocal lessons around the time of the 3.0 reunion?). Still, at best they are average singers amongst the 'real world', and well below average for nationally known acts. But, even if they were strong singers, I doubt that they would be much more accessible. The phans would appreciate that aspect of their perfomances, but it wouldn't change the structure of their songs and shows or the philosophy of the band. Maybe they would have had a few minor mainstream hits, but overall I don't think it would change much about the perception of the band.
This is the problem with a lot of Trey's solo work, at least since his untitled album. The melodies are bad. Same goes for TTE. I loved that song first time I heard it as an instrumental, but those melodies laid over top RUIN it.
Trey soloing = A beautiful voice
You must be logged in to leave a comment!

Back to Forum
Oldest First
Newest First