Try our mobile site, m.phish.net!

Phish.net: a Project of the Mockingbird Foundation




Back to Forum Back to Forum Oldest First Oldest First Newest First Newest First

12/29's undeserved rating

← Previous123Next →View All

Sprachtor Permalink
Sprachtor Be ause it people are going to vote down my opinion, I will keep on saying it.
Score: 1

Sprachtor Permalink
Sprachtor Worst show ever.
Score: 3

ypehmish Permalink
ypehmish @Sprachtor said:
Worst show ever.
Yeah pretty accurate Image
Score: 4

Sprachtor Permalink
Sprachtor How original yemfetish, just like your threads.
Score: 0

Jimmymac03 Permalink
Jimmymac03 @walstib said:
Suzy's are normally just Suzy's but Page kicked that Suzy's ass. I could care less what set and when a song is played.
Signed 100%
Score: 1

n00b100 Permalink
n00b100 Can we use this thread as yet another reason why the .net ratings system should be overhauled?
Score: 0

mangobrain Permalink
mangobrain Undeserved, in the sense that I wouldn't have given it that high of a rating. The show was sort of pedestrian (2, at most 2.5), although well played, imo (I don't really get into pointing out flubs and all that). I did like the encore, however. The other shows were far superior on all fronts. In the end though, I was in the building, and there is nothing like being at a Phish show.
Score: 1

johnnyd Phish.net Staff Permalink
johnnyd I agree the ratings system needs to have 20x more points of discrimination. Asking a fanbase like us to spot every show as a 1-5 is just not enough options.

That said, 12/29 at a 3.0 would be generous. 2.0 might be a little low.

Which, of course, is not to say it was not insanely fun to be there. Because it was.
Score: 1

ProfJibboo Permalink
ProfJibboo I gave it a 3. Here is the review I wrote today on here summarizing why I ranked it the way I did. I'm just not nearly as articulate as the rest of the board. Reviews of 12/29

I just don't see why someone can't give the show a 3 and still have an awesome time. I spent the second set dancing right next to @Jimmymac03 and I didn't stop dancing for a minute.
Score: 0

Jimmymac03 Permalink
Jimmymac03 @ProfJibboo said:
I just don't see why someone can't give the show a 3 and still have an awesome time. I spent the second set dancing right next to @Jimmymac03 and I didn't stop dancing for a minute.
This is true. It was full on rage and I loved every second of this show in person. I get why people are down on it but TBH I have also loved it listening back. I do think it was the "weakest" night of the run, but being able to say that is such a good thing cause it was a very fun show.
Score: 1

Jimmymac03 Permalink
Jimmymac03 I should also note every show I am at is a 5... it should come as no surprise to folks around here that I am a bit of a fluffer though :)
Score: 0

deBebbler Permalink
deBebbler The composed section of Coil made me want to get under a desk/hide in a closet.

Butchered.

Score: 1

dpwilljr Permalink
dpwilljr It's difficult to rate a show from just the first experience. Listening to each show a few times makes you realize some of the versions were way better than you remembered.
There were portions of 12/29 that were exceptional.
I won't have a final opinion until I listen to each show at least two more times.
Score: 2

MomaDan Permalink
MomaDan In the scope of 2012 it was probably a bottom 5 show. No stand out jams, a bunch of flubs and flat out mistakes (Coil, Waves). "The energy was crazy!!!" or "I had soooooo much fun" does not translate to tape, which is how shows are supposed to be ranked. For me it ranks above 12/30/11 and the Alpharetta '11 shows while being very slightly below Atlanta. From a musical perspective only
Score: 3

Midcoaster Permalink
Midcoaster I guess I fall into the category of a "non-discerning" listener. For one, I don't have the time to spin each show several rounds through and have little time, in fact, for seeing shows at all. I knew what I was in for: Saturday night madness at MSG. Yeah, the crowd exploded at irregular intervals, the Waves wasn't the Bethel soundcheck and I guess things can't be absolutely as perfect as we would like them to be 100% of the time.

Conclusion? I felt blessed to hear Golden Age melt into Waves, a song I've wanted to hear since it's debut. That was a joy in and of itself. Set and setting folks. From the East GA railing, dancing these old bones, this was a great show. Bringing loved ones along who aren't die-hards, this was actually a good show for them. Set and setting. We all had a blast, and it was a great way to close out my 25th year of seeing these guys. No complaints.
Score: 2

treysoldguitar Permalink
This show was pedestrian at best and it was evident from the start. Having said that, I had a great time and it was still better than anything else I could have done that night.

I think the real fear in the community was that this might turn into another 2011 run, where the first night was the best of the run. Thankfully 12/30/12 put an end to that fear from the get go.
Score: 1

troutins1 Permalink
Was def a great show.. Makes me excited for 2013
Score: 0

TheEmu Phish.net Staff Permalink
TheEmu @n00b100 said:
Can we use this thread as yet another reason why the .net ratings system should be overhauled?
I'm going to have a blog post pretty soon about the ratings system. But I think this is a perfect example of why the ratings system doesn't need to be overhauled.

12/29 is currently rated comparably to Atlanta and Kansas City, which seems to be a pretty accurate reflection of where .net at large feels the show should be ranked (currently it's at 3.57, the 6th lowest rated show of 2012).

Here are the current top rated shows of 2012 according to .net raters:

Dick's 1 (8/31)
BGCA 3 (8/19)
Dick's 3 (9/2)
YEMSG 3 (12/30)
Worcester 1 (6/7)
SPAC 3 (7/8)
SPAC 1 (7/6)
Burgettstown (6/23)
NYE
Dick's 2 (9/1)

Do any of these shows not belong in the discussion for best shows of 2012? Forget for a moment the specific number that each show has pulled. The question to ask yourself is: Is the ratings system doing a good job at identifying shows that are widely considered to be high quality? If you look at that list, and at the list as a whole, the answer is unquestionably yes.

I'll save the rest until I can properly formulate my argument for the blog piece.
Score: 5

Jimmymac03 Permalink
Jimmymac03 @TheEmu I feel Long Beach should be on that list.
Score: 1

birmy Permalink
birmy Revisiting now. I love how the crowd erupts during Reba, chill'd
Score: 1

patper Permalink
patper You guys take this stuff way too seriously. What if the show is rated exactly how everyone wanted to rate it? Why do you care so much if other people like a show more than you do?

It's music. It's f***ing mysterious why our brains like it or don't like it. Stop trying to quantify it.
Score: 0

n00b100 Permalink
n00b100 @patper said:
You guys take this stuff way too seriously. What if the show is rated exactly how everyone wanted to rate it? Why do you care so much if other people like a show more than you do?

It's music. It's f***ing mysterious why our brains like it or don't like it. Stop trying to quantify it.
Serious answer: Because we, as human beings, tend to see the world in different ways, and because we don't have the absolute power of empathy to understand why different people react to and understand different things, the main way we tend to react to *that* is via discussion and argument. Oftentimes it's because we find ourselves on an island from the general consensus and need to explain why this is so (for instance, my feeling that Big Cypress is massively overrated). Other times, it's because we're part of that consensus and want to express to a doubter why we're a part of said consensus (basically this entire thread). Yes, of course music is subjective and difficult to quantify, especially when it comes to the really good stuff (because I think we can all agree when something is bad, and *even then* there are defenders of that something), but I like to think that *because* it's so mysterious and difficult to quantify, talking about and debating it helps further understanding, or at the very least gives us something to chew on. I've changed my minds on shows plenty of times, often via discussion on this thread or on relistening to an old show and giving me a new perspective on things. The human mind is so insanely hard to fathom, but wanting to express one's own opinion and debate (on a friendly level, of course) others' opinions is not hard to fathom at all.

tl;dr answer: It's fun. C'mon!
Score: 4

phootyjon Permalink
the bag, halleys, limb, gin, golden age-> waves, bug, 46 days, and coil were all played well and worth a second listen...the show did lack flow and imo had a odd set-list construction...but it did have some great peaks and tight playing throughout...i'd give it a 3 star and be ok with it.
Score: 1

Slothberries Permalink
Slothberries @n00b100 said:
@patper said:
You guys take this stuff way too seriously. What if the show is rated exactly how everyone wanted to rate it? Why do you care so much if other people like a show more than you do?

It's music. It's f***ing mysterious why our brains like it or don't like it. Stop trying to quantify it.
Serious answer: Because we, as human beings, tend to see the world in different ways, and because we don't have the absolute power of empathy to understand why different people react to and understand different things, the main way we tend to react to *that* is via discussion and argument. Oftentimes it's because we find ourselves on an island from the general consensus and need to explain why this is so (for instance, my feeling that Big Cypress is massively overrated). Other times, it's because we're part of that consensus and want to express to a doubter why we're a part of said consensus (basically this entire thread). Yes, of course music is subjective and difficult to quantify, especially when it comes to the really good stuff (because I think we can all agree when something is bad, and *even then* there are defenders of that something), but I like to think that *because* it's so mysterious and difficult to quantify, talking about and debating it helps further understanding, or at the very least gives us something to chew on. I've changed my minds on shows plenty of times, often via discussion on this thread or on relistening to an old show and giving me a new perspective on things. The human mind is so insanely hard to fathom, but wanting to express one's own opinion and debate (on a friendly level, of course) others' opinions is not hard to fathom at all.

tl;dr answer: It's fun. C'mon!
@n00b100...Youre a good kid and a smart kid and i have thoroughly enjoyed reading your posts since you became a member of the forum. Please dont take the following as anything more than an observation....

what you said about big cypress is a perfect example of the enormous generational gap that is represented on the forum. You young cats, as much as you love Phish TODAY, cant and dont appreciate the old days as much as someone who was a part of it then. I mean, Cypress was the biggest event in Phish's career to that date (and maybe even to THIS date). To say it is overrated doesnt really make a whole lot of sense. I wasnt there for those two shows, but I lived during that era and have listened to the shows countless times. The music was great and the fact that they played all night makes it even more incredible. shit, i get tired after 5 minutes of constant chording....I cant even imagine playing guitar, or ANY instrument, all night. AND playing it well. Im not trying to knock you or your level of fandom, @n00b100. like I said, i think youre a good kid and a good fan. but cypress overrated? I just never thought I would ever hear/see someone say/write something like that.

The point im trying to make is that youd be hard pressed to find fan who lived during all/most eras of Phish that would say that Cypress is overrated. there is clearly a major gap between noob and vet and what each group considers great Phish and not so great Phish.

I realize that I just opened up a new(old) can of worms with this post. Should our ratings be based on the music and the music alone? Or is it ok to let our ratings be influenced by other factors (attendance, the shows place in history, etc, etc)? Whichever is the correct way to rate, I think we can agree that personal bias's get in the way more often than not. and thats something that will never change.
Score: 3

ProfPhan Permalink
Sure, better than last year's MSG run but I don't think they hang with the highlights of this past summer.

The Dick's run was an embarrassment of riches, and the Cincy Twist and the SPAC Sally and Piper were all-time great jams.

Don't think we got anything that is top 10 2012 out this run.

Any thoughts?
Score: 0

smuggs Permalink
smuggs msg nye is expensive. people have to fluff the shows to make it seem like it was worth it. i was a victim of this last year. does anyone really want to be in NYC for the holidays ? ride the train with a bunch of miserable robots and walk crowded streets in sub freezing temps with no bathrooms ? i had the best time last year but honestly would be looking forward to a non NYE msg run.

i hope everyone that attended this year had the best time too ~!
Score: 1

MomaDan Permalink
MomaDan @ProfPhan said:
Sure, better than last year's MSG run but I don't think they hang with the highlights of this past summer.

The Dick's run was an embarrassment of riches, and the Cincy Twist and the SPAC Sally and Piper were all-time great jams.

Don't think we got anything that is top 10 2012 out this run.

Any thoughts?
Top Tweezer of 3.0, Top 3 Wolfman's, Top 5 Carini.
Score: 0

n00b100 Permalink
n00b100 WARNING: THIS IS THE VERY DEFINITION OF TL;DR. DO NOT READ UNLESS YOU WANT TO SEE ME BLATHER ABOUT BIG CYPRESS AND PROBABLY MAKE AN ASS OF MYSELF. THANK YOU IN ADVANCE.

@Slothberries,

Thanks for the kind words. Let me try to elaborate a bit on my comment about Big Cypress (and, I suppose, provide the review of 12/31/99 nobody was asking for):

As an actual *event*, there is literally no way to overrate or properly sum up what Big Cypress means. Even my n00by self has a reasonable idea of what it meant to Phish themselves and the Phish community. How could I not? It's both a symbolic ending to the late-90s minimalist style and a symbolic ending to 1.0 itself; it seems pretty clear that the psychic effects of having played that show (along with whatever the hell else was going on within the group in that last year), if not outright necessitated the hiatus, helped speed it along mightily. And it's a show absolutely without comparison in Phish's catalog (as @waxbanks has pointed out in the past), nine hours of music, six and a half in one set, much of it at a very high level, on the last day of the millennium (well, not really, but let's go with that for argument's sake), in as dramatic a location as you could choose for a show on said final day, in front of as large a crowd as Phish has ever played for. Three of the four members of Phish state that it's their all-time favorite show (or the best show they ever played, I don't remember which). It's a monumental, epochal show. I couldn't dispute that, nor am I foolish enough to try.

As a *show on tape*...well...

It's easily in the 99th percentile of Phish shows, even on tape. I think that's pretty safe to say. Some of the jams are among the most beloved of all Phish jams, that's pretty easy to say as well. I personally think Sand -> Quadrophonic Topplings is the jam of the year (although the 9/18 Boogie On, 12/7 Halley's, and 12/11 Ghost might have something to say about that). It's a great show. Even that's not in dispute.

And yet...

People often say you can't stack an ordinary show (on tape) against Cypress because its length and musical quality means that no show can even come close to it. The way I see it, though, you can't stack an ordinary show (on tape) against Cypress because ordinary shows are, in general, a much more pleasurable *listening experience* than Big Cypress. Not to speak for anyone else, but I often feel like when people say their favorite show is Cypress, what they really mean is their favorite show is a certain chunk of the NINE F-ING HOURS of music they played that night. I mean, there's a reason why people tend to save Cypress for long car trips or plane flights or whatever the hell else. It's a long goddamn show, and listening to it is tantamount to making a commitment. Nine hours of ANYTHING generally ends up being an ordeal more than anything else, even if that anything is your favorite thing ever. I've sat through the Godfather saga, all three original Star Wars movies, and even a marathon of The Wire - by the end of all three, I was mentally exhausted plain and simple. It's like a mixtape - the best thing about a mixtape is that because you're not bound to listen to it all the way through, you can pick and choose the best of what is generally the best. And that's how I think about Cypress - one of the best Phish mixtapes ever made. I don't think of it as a show, and certainly not a cohesive piece of music.

This is clearly my own bias (but then isn't this all?), but I tend to gravitate towards sets that feel like one piece of music, in which every song blends together into one whole statement, like there was no other way that set could have gone except for the way that it did. 6/14/00 II does that. 12/6/97 does that (it's the prototypical example). Both sets of 8/31/12 do that. Cypress, IMO, does not do that. How could it? It's nine damn hours long! There's a host of great music being played, and also a lot of breathers as well - to get setlist-nerdy, I see a lot of commas and not a lot of arrows. And God knows they shouldn't be penalized for taking the occasional rest during a six and a half hour set, but when I'm listening on tape I hear a really good jam and then My Soul or Heavy Things, rinse and repeat. There's no rinse and repeat in Fukuoka or 12/11/99 II.

And, as great as a lot of the jamming in 12/31/99 is, a LOT of that jamming tends to explore avenues that they explored hours ago in the very same set, and more or less to the same effect. That's not me saying the show all sounds the same (it rather obviously doesn't), but me saying enough of it DOES sound the same that I find myself occasionally losing interest while listening, which doesn't happen when I listen to Drum Logos or 11/17/97 or 8/31/12. And laugh at me for using 8/31/12 as an example if you want, but even the most ardent "3.0 will never come close to 1.0" fan will admit 8/31/12 is one of 3.0's highlights, so I feel comfortable doing so.

Actually, let's use that as a perfect counterexample. 8/31/12 has four long jams as a result of a fixed 15-song setlist, which necessitated some songs to be stretched out. But all four of those jams have distinct qualities and are identifiable as their own high-quality jam (which is why "best jam of 2012" lists tend to have all 4 listed in varying ranks). Big Cypress has probably 3 times as many long jams, but those jams are long because they have to kill time until the sun rises, and often sound like they're killing time until the sun rises. Sure, the quality is high throughout, but high-quality soporific music is still soporific music, at the end of the day. And yeah, I've said before that I'll often skip songs and head right to the jams, but with my all-time favorite sets I feel no need to do that, because even the usually skippable songs feel like part of the whole; with Cypress, it feels like lots of great parts with no whole. There's no there there, as Gertrude Stein said. Chop that set up into 3 fractions, and any of the 3 could make an argument as set of 1999. All by itself...it's a Frankenstein's monster. On tape, of course.

To (finally) get to your observation, in that I called it "overrated"...well, from my standpoint, *of course* it's overrated. It's ranked as the best show on Phish.net and probably by a sizable chunk of Phish's fandom, and by a healthy margin ahead of 12/31/95 (another show I find overrated, but that's another story). I mentioned in the "underrated 2012 show" thread that underrated doesn't just have to mean good show everyone thinks isn't that good, but can also mean great show everyone thinks is just good. And the inverse works as well - an overrated show doesn't have to be a bad show everyone thinks sucks, but can also be a darn good show everyone thinks is the greatest thing since sliced bread.

The last paragraph of your post couldn't have been said better by anybody else. If you were at Cypress, that's your favorite show ever (most likely), and I wouldn't dare to argue against that. If it's your favorite show *on tape*, I wouldn't want to change your mind. As for myself, a Phish fan that has nothing but the utmost respect for Phish's long and storied history and all the fans that have followed them for decades plus and have forgotten more about their shows than I know and have attended any number of classic shows, a Phish fan that can only build my own understanding of and love for the band based on my own previous experiences and what I myself consider to be an optimal Phish show on tape? It's not my pick for the best show ever, and not even close.
Score: 13

n00b100 Permalink
n00b100 @MomaDan said:
@ProfPhan said:
Sure, better than last year's MSG run but I don't think they hang with the highlights of this past summer.

The Dick's run was an embarrassment of riches, and the Cincy Twist and the SPAC Sally and Piper were all-time great jams.

Don't think we got anything that is top 10 2012 out this run.

Any thoughts?
Top Tweezer of 3.0, Top 3 Wolfman's, Top 5 Carini.
Make that a top 3 Carini, toss in a top 3 Bowie, and I'm with you all the way.
Score: 0

dscott Permalink
@ProfPhan said:
Sure, better than last year's MSG run but I don't think they hang with the highlights of this past summer.

The Dick's run was an embarrassment of riches, and the Cincy Twist and the SPAC Sally and Piper were all-time great jams.

Don't think we got anything that is top 10 2012 out this run.

Any thoughts?
DWD (multi-galactic space excursion) and Carini (the vortex predator cometh) from 12/30, as well as Wolfman's Drummer Boy Brother 12/28 (spine-tingling euphoria), were mighty special.
Score: 0

Sprachtor Permalink
Sprachtor I cheer that post on Noob. I was talking to slothberries the other night and unless you were need deep in hallucinogens, making it through 6.5 hours is a tall order, even if that order is comprised of your favorite band. Hard to not call that type of play overkill.

Of course, it does add to a certain creativity and risk taking that isn't available in your two hour shows. No one remembers failures in 6 hour sets when the next jump shot swishes.

I personally prefer a flowing piece of music from front to back in a regular shows framework.

Score: 2

InThatWeekapaugGroove Permalink
@dscott said:
@ProfPhan said:
Sure, better than last year's MSG run but I don't think they hang with the highlights of this past summer.

The Dick's run was an embarrassment of riches, and the Cincy Twist and the SPAC Sally and Piper were all-time great jams.

Don't think we got anything that is top 10 2012 out this run.

Any thoughts?
DWD (multi-galactic space excursion) and Carini (the vortex predator cometh) from 12/30, as well as Wolfman's Drummer Boy Brother 12/28 (spine-tingling euphoria), were mighty special.
I would certainly add the Tweezer from 12/28 to that as well.
Score: 1

MiguelSanchez Permalink
MiguelSanchez @nOOb100
I actually agree with a lot of what you are saying. I have said it on this forum before, but i also think it is overrated. Generally speaking, i'm not a big fan of phish's sound in december '99. i think the music at cypress is good, but i don't think it is the "best ever," which is generally assumed within the phish community. i won't go on too long.

if you want my thoughts on this, you can search the thread "is big cypress overrated." i think that was the name of that oldie...

Score: 2

n00b100 Permalink
n00b100 @MiguelSanchez said:
@nOOb100
I actually agree with a lot of what you are saying. I have said it on this forum before, but i also think it is overrated. Generally speaking, i'm not a big fan of phish's sound in december '99. i think the music at cypress is good, but i don't think it is the "best ever," which is generally assumed within the phish community. i won't go on too long.

if you want my thoughts on this, you can search the thread "is big cypress overrated." i think that was the name of that oldie...
Yeah, I remember we both agreed on that in another thread. I meant to include you in my above post, sorry about that.
Score: 0

Jimmymac03 Permalink
Jimmymac03 Holy shit dude... I really want to read that... I really do... it's just... you know... and shit.
Score: 0

Slothberries Permalink
Slothberries Great post, @n00b100. Thanks!

Im glad you took the time to explain your stance on Cypress. good stuff in there. Youre definitely a sharp young man.
Score: 2

chris200w Permalink
chris200w @Jimmymac03 said:
Holy shit dude... I really want to read that... I really do... it's just... you know... and shit.
It's worth it. Would read again, @n00b100.

Edit: and FWIW, I only had to use a dictionary once.
Score: 4

n00b100 Permalink
n00b100 Thanks, guys, especially @Slothberries. I hold all you guys in the utmost respect. Even Giants fans. ;)
Score: 1

Jimmymac03 Permalink
Jimmymac03 @chris200w said:
@Jimmymac03 said:
Holy shit dude... I really want to read that... I really do... it's just... you know... and shit.
It's worth it. Would read again, @n00b100.

Edit: and FWIW, I only had to use a dictionary once.
Once! Damn. Ok, I will read when I get home from work.
Score: 0

Slothberries Permalink
Slothberries @n00b100 said:
Thanks, guys, especially @Slothberries. I hold all you guys in the utmost respect. Even Giants fans. ;)
Im actually not a giants fan. Ive been meaning to change that Damned coughlin avatar.

/betting avatar changes on niners/giants games
Score: 1

n00b100 Permalink
n00b100 @Slothberries said:
@n00b100 said:
Thanks, guys, especially @Slothberries. I hold all you guys in the utmost respect. Even Giants fans. ;)
Im actually not a giants fan. Ive been meaning to change that Damned coughlin avatar.

/betting avatar changes on niners/giants games
Oh, that's right, I forgot the "NYG best NFL team" thread was started as a joke.
Score: 0

_________________________ Permalink
_________________________ didnt read much of of this thread, but I tried to read the longest post, but I had to stop reading when @n00b100 didnt included the 9-29-1999 2001 on his list of jams of the year
Score: 1

Jimmymac03 Permalink
Jimmymac03 @n00b100 work is slow so I read it. Very well said nOOb. I dig everything (not agree, but dig).
Score: 2

mfhgreyboy Permalink
mfhgreyboy @n00b100 said:
I tend to gravitate towards sets that feel like one piece of music, in which every song blends together into one whole statement, like there was no other way that set could have gone except for the way that it did.
This is a pretty accurate statement of what I'm looking for.

Excellent post, overall. I pretty much agree with everything you said.
Score: 2

Herbdacious Permalink
Herbdacious @Furry_Thug said:
I gave 12/29 a rating of 2 after watching the webcast and one re-listen. At best it was an average Phish show in this era. The reason my rating went down from there was mainly because it was overall pretty sloppy, rushed and didn't flow all that well. Sugar Shack, LxL, Boogie On, Coil... were not played well. Reba was rushed, as was R&R.

I said it over the weekend, you have to take YOUR experience out of rating shows, and in the same breath, don't get offended when a show you were at has a lower than you expected rating. Every Phish show is fun, you're doing it wrong if its not. The music is crazy subjective, the experience is beyond subjective.
this guys is right. 11/28/09 was my 3rd show and i left bitching about how they didn't play enough songs, and that 11/27/09 was much better....
in hindsight I was soooooo wrong.
it's all very subjective. at the time i wanted to hear phish songs I hadn't heard, and a lot of them. not 50 minutes of jamming. Now i've heard most of the songs, I wanna hear jamming lol. and have really realized what phish is all about.
Score: 0

SpiritWolf Permalink
SpiritWolf though people throw some hate towards the waves i got a kick out of it ending into Caspian. Underwater to floating on the waves, i got a geek out of that. i was expecting a monster Caspian due to that but i was a little let down, and jams out of Caspian might be up their with my favorites, so pretty. i think the set was make or break here unfortunately i believe they missed a golden chance for something special. they were really building a neat atmosphere.
Score: 0

← Previous123Next →View All

You must be logged in to leave a comment!

Username

Password

Register | Forgot Password


Back to Forum Back to Forum Oldest First Oldest First Newest First Newest First
Login Register