Attractive, phish-knowledgeable lady comes up and asks if she can share. "Of course!" I say "This scene is about caring and sharing." We talk the Phish game. Blah. Blah. Blah.
Lights go down and like smoke, said hot chic is gone like the smoke that billowed from Angelina Jolie lips. Goodbye WEED WHORE! Happened 3/4 nights.
Think it would make a great, funny song but my friend Brad tells me that Ween already wrote it many many years ago.
So Andrea, Kelly and Shannon...you will forever be my Weed Whores.
Move along, whore....nobody is doing coke over here.
Did you think you're were gonna get laid because you shared your joint!? They just asked to get high Bro... maybe it was YOU that was assuming something better? Would you have been as generous with three Dudes walking up and wanting to share your buzz?well, i don't think he was thinking he was going to get laid. just a funny observation...
On the Internet however, I defer to something I recently read on the green board discussing how there is no "sex" and we are all epicene. Meaning that we stand on virtues aside from how we are created, the idea being....that a female couldn't utilize her sex to take advantage of lonely forum dwelling people, concersely a female could not be degraded.
@grooveholmes, would you just give a chick your bag? What do you think @phan83,?
maybe Ms. @princesscasp, would like to weigh in on this as a female member of the community?
I'll give any chick anything they need anytime! I try to smoke them out so hard they nod out.Where were you?
I don't think I ran into you but for a moment at the meet up. ::files it away under sugar daddy::
I'll give any chick anything they need anytime! I try to smoke them out so hard they nod out.I feel like this post could be read to be infinitely more creepy than it was intended to imply.
Am I the only one who finds this a little sexist? If a guy walked up to you, asked to share your joint, had a nice conversation and then walked away to go be with his friends when the show started, would you call him a weed whore? More likely, you wouldn't find anything weird or even rude about his behavior. Would you really expect or want him to stick around for the entire show?Be flattered that they get this flustered. I share what I have w/ whomever is around me. We are different, think differently, have different expectations than men. I love this about the forum...a peek at what is going on up in there. I'm not offended, I'm dipping...kinda.
Besides, they're talking about weed whores, not exactly chicks like us...
I said chicks...
Am I the only one who finds this a little sexist? If a guy walked up to you, asked to share your joint, had a nice conversation and then walked away to go be with his friends when the show started, would you call him a weed whore? More likely, you wouldn't find anything weird or even rude about his behavior. Would you really expect or want him to stick around for the entire show?You seem to be easily offended, just sayin,'
If they were "weed whores", wouldn't that imply that they gave you something in return for the smoke? Sounds to me like they were just freeloaders.
Am I the only one who finds this a little sexist? If a guy walked up to you, asked to share your joint, had a nice conversation and then walked away to go be with his friends when the show started, would you call him a weed whore? More likely, you wouldn't find anything weird or even rude about his behavior. Would you really expect or want him to stick around for the entire show?I'm sure they asked all the females around them first and only went to him as a last resort. Also when they approached him, they had no preconceived notions that they were going to ask him for something in exchange for nothing.
It's a game that both sides play and seeing it as sexist from just the male behavior is only 50% of what happened.
While he called them a "weed whore" they are most likely on phishchick.net talking about the "easy mark" that smoked them up for free like an idiot.
If they were "weed whores", wouldn't that imply that they gave you something in return for the smoke? Sounds to me like they were just freeloaders.Not really...going from guy to guy who has smoke...weed whore...![]()
Giving a beej for pot? She just likes him...or bj's.
@the_Landlady said:Not really, on the contrary it sounds like OP is more easily offended than I am. OP was offended by the behavior of the "weed whores" whereas I would consider the same behavior to be acceptable, regardless as to whether it was a chick or a dude. Expecting more from a chick than you would from a dude in the same scenario and getting pissed when she doesn't deliver = sexist, just sayin'Am I the only one who finds this a little sexist? If a guy walked up to you, asked to share your joint, had a nice conversation and then walked away to go be with his friends when the show started, would you call him a weed whore? More likely, you wouldn't find anything weird or even rude about his behavior. Would you really expect or want him to stick around for the entire show?You seem to be easily offended, just sayin,'
@_________________________ said:That is not the definition of sexism. Just sayin.@the_Landlady said:Not really, on the contrary it sounds like OP is more easily offended than I am. OP was offended by the behavior of the "weed whores" whereas I would consider the same behavior to be acceptable, regardless as to whether it was a chick or a dude. Expecting more from a chick than you would from a dude in the same scenario and getting pissed when she doesn't deliver = sexist, just sayin'Am I the only one who finds this a little sexist? If a guy walked up to you, asked to share your joint, had a nice conversation and then walked away to go be with his friends when the show started, would you call him a weed whore? More likely, you wouldn't find anything weird or even rude about his behavior. Would you really expect or want him to stick around for the entire show?You seem to be easily offended, just sayin,'
But, I also think we went pretty freaking fast from "caring and sharing" to "weed whore."
If it was really just about the former, I wouldn't think you'd give a shit whether she stayed on your hip all night or if she vanished like...

Now, if she didn't even say "Thanks"....then we may have a problem.
Why can't we just say, "If someone offers you a joint, all they should expect, is for you to smoke that joint and say thank you...anything else is extracurricular."
I've never had a dude not blow me for a hit of my joint.I just ask for a rusty trombone
@the_Landlady said:Maybe they asked all the females around them first and only went to him as a last resort... or more likely, they saw someone blazing and politely asked if they could partake. Just like a ton of dudes and chicks do all the time. I'm not saying that there aren't chicks who target dudes just to use them, I'm just saying that the ladies should be given the benefit of the doubt. Isn't it more likely that they are just nice people, who wanted to blaze and have a nice conversation? Let's not assume they are weed hungry bitches that walk all over men.Am I the only one who finds this a little sexist? If a guy walked up to you, asked to share your joint, had a nice conversation and then walked away to go be with his friends when the show started, would you call him a weed whore? More likely, you wouldn't find anything weird or even rude about his behavior. Would you really expect or want him to stick around for the entire show?I'm sure they asked all the females around them first and only went to him as a last resort. Also when they approached him, they had no preconceived notions that they were going to ask him for something in exchange for nothing.
It's a game that both sides play and seeing it as sexist from just the male behavior is only 50% of what happened.
While he called them a "weed whore" they are most likely on phishchick.net talking about the "easy mark" that smoked them up for free like an idiot.
Being approached by someone and asked to hit your smoke is another. If someone asks me to hit my joint, I'll probably say "no" and pass it to someone else.
::always passes joints, always::
@the_Landlady said:what is your definition of sexism?@_________________________ said:That is not the definition of sexism. Just sayin.@the_Landlady said:Not really, on the contrary it sounds like OP is more easily offended than I am. OP was offended by the behavior of the "weed whores" whereas I would consider the same behavior to be acceptable, regardless as to whether it was a chick or a dude. Expecting more from a chick than you would from a dude in the same scenario and getting pissed when she doesn't deliver = sexist, just sayin'Am I the only one who finds this a little sexist? If a guy walked up to you, asked to share your joint, had a nice conversation and then walked away to go be with his friends when the show started, would you call him a weed whore? More likely, you wouldn't find anything weird or even rude about his behavior. Would you really expect or want him to stick around for the entire show?You seem to be easily offended, just sayin,'
also, sharing is caring. sharing and expecting stuff (conversation, bjs, return favors) in return and then calling whomeever you shared with a 'weed whore' on a public forum is *not* caring.
Sharing with people around you is one thing.this too. OP doesn't have to give anyone his weed. if he gave his weed up just being friendly, nice! but if he gave it up, then got upset when he got nothing except a smoke and a nice convo in return, than he obviously had an ulterior motive if ever so slight.
Being approached by someone and asked to hit your smoke is another. If someone asks me to hit my joint, I'll probably say "no" and pass it to someone else.
::always passes joints, always::
plus, calling someone a whore is sexist. thought that was obvious....
OP if it was a dude, would you be making this thread?
@listen4myHorn said:All of these things could be true and you and I are in agreement. Regardless of sex, one can usually tell right away the motives of the approaching human.@the_Landlady said:Maybe they asked all the females around them first and only went to him as a last resort... or more likely, they saw someone blazing and politely asked if they could partake. Just like a ton of dudes and chicks do all the time. I'm not saying that there aren't chicks who target dudes just to use them, I'm just saying that the ladies should be given the benefit of the doubt. Isn't it more likely that they are just nice people, who wanted to blaze and have a nice conversation? Let's not assume they are weed hungry bitches that walk all over men.Am I the only one who finds this a little sexist? If a guy walked up to you, asked to share your joint, had a nice conversation and then walked away to go be with his friends when the show started, would you call him a weed whore? More likely, you wouldn't find anything weird or even rude about his behavior. Would you really expect or want him to stick around for the entire show?I'm sure they asked all the females around them first and only went to him as a last resort. Also when they approached him, they had no preconceived notions that they were going to ask him for something in exchange for nothing.
It's a game that both sides play and seeing it as sexist from just the male behavior is only 50% of what happened.
While he called them a "weed whore" they are most likely on phishchick.net talking about the "easy mark" that smoked them up for free like an idiot.
And on the plus side you have given me a new favorite phrase:
"weed hungry bitches"
So thank you for that.
You seem to be easily offended, just sayin,'"
Not really, on the contrary it sounds like OP is more easily offended than I am. OP was offended by the behavior of the "weed whores" whereas I would consider the same behavior to be acceptable, regardless as to whether it was a chick or a dude. Expecting more from a chick than you would from a dude in the same scenario and getting pissed when she doesn't deliver = sexist, just sayin'"
That is not the definition of sexism. Just sayin."
what is your definition of sexism?
also, sharing is caring. sharing and expecting stuff (conversation, bjs, return favors) in return and then calling whomeever you shared with a 'weed whore' on a public forum is *not* caring."
sexism is not just male sexist behavior towards the female. It can and does go the other way as well.
I could have better said that the definition provided was only 1/2 of the definition.
@YorkvilleBeerLover said:My bad I was flying high all 3 nights. Make sure to connect next time - I like the idea of being a sugar daddy.I'll give any chick anything they need anytime! I try to smoke them out so hard they nod out.Where were you?I don't think I ran into you but for a moment at the meet up.
::files it away under sugar daddy::
If I could get a jacket like this!
@YorkvilleBeerLover said:And I should say likewise for dudes. I like to force them to get overly highI'll give any chick anything they need anytime! I try to smoke them out so hard they nod out.I feel like this post could be read to be infinitely more creepy than it was intended to imply.
Am I the only one who finds this a little sexist? If a guy walked up to you, asked to share your joint, had a nice conversation and then walked away to go be with his friends when the show started, would you call him a weed whore? More likely, you wouldn't find anything weird or even rude about his behavior. Would you really expect or want him to stick around for the entire show?I think his point was that these girls were using the fact that they are women to get something for free. I've never had a guy ask me for a bump or a hit out of the blue unless I was already friends with them.
@YorkvilleBeerLover said:No, it was meant to be creepy. Post delivers.I'll give any chick anything they need anytime! I try to smoke them out so hard they nod out.I feel like this post could be read to be infinitely more creepy than it was intended to imply.
@the_Landlady said:Really? That's surprising, because it happens to me almost every time I light up at a show. From my experience, guys do it just as much as chicks. I understand his point, and my point is that assuming they were using the fact that they are women to get something for free, rather than assuming they just saw someone blazing and politely asked to partake with the sole intention of blazing and having a nice conversation, not intending to "use" anyone, is a little sexist.Am I the only one who finds this a little sexist? If a guy walked up to you, asked to share your joint, had a nice conversation and then walked away to go be with his friends when the show started, would you call him a weed whore? More likely, you wouldn't find anything weird or even rude about his behavior. Would you really expect or want him to stick around for the entire show?I think his point was that these girls were using the fact that they are women to get something for free. I've never had a guy ask me for a bump or a hit out of the blue unless I was already friends with them.
my point is that assuming they were using the fact that they are women to get something for free, rather than assuming they just saw someone blazing and politely asked to partake with the sole intention of blazing and having a nice conversation, not intending to "use" anyone, is a little sexist.But wouldn't the best person to determine which one of these scenarios played out be @choda?
when i'm with mr. slice at show getting down and boogying someone ALWAYS offers me a joint. My first solo show was the 29th, i didn't have anything on me and my thought process was meh someone will offer me a joint, i usually only take one hit so why bother bringing stuff with me.
NO ONE offered me anything. second set i sought out a friend.
what are you dudes afraid of a chick by herself?
@the_Landlady said:But he said it all already. They came up and asked him if they could share. They didn't hit on him all night, pretending to be into him and then disappear after they blazed. They made their intent clear, he agreed to share his joint. Maybe OP should have been as clear as they were and said "Yes, but only if you hang out with me all night and/or hook up with me." But then they probably would have walked away and asked the next person they saw blazing.my point is that assuming they were using the fact that they are women to get something for free, rather than assuming they just saw someone blazing and politely asked to partake with the sole intention of blazing and having a nice conversation, not intending to "use" anyone, is a little sexist.But wouldn't the best person to determine which one of these scenarios played out be @choda?
I get ops point I would expect her to stay around and spark a little conversation just for a little bit afterwords, but if not itd be totally cool cause I would still be seeing phish and I dont go to phish shows to pick up chicks
At Long Beach this summer a gal behind us hit up my wife while we wer hitting one and asked for a drag. I'm ok with it... Would I ever ask? No... But she seemed nice enough and I brought in plenty so no worries helping someone enjoy the show more.
@mfhgreyboy said:I'm with you, I'm just trying to give him some sort of benefit of the doubt because as it has been explained so far seems pretty silly. Which, based on @choda's absence from this thread might have been his intent all along: Pointing out a silly observation. Unfortunately, it used language that sparked a huge analysis of his point.@the_Landlady said:But he said it all already. They came up and asked him if they could share. They didn't hit on him all night, pretending to be into him and then disappear after they blazed. They made their intent clear, he agreed to share his joint. Maybe OP should have been as clear as they were and said "Yes, but only if you hang out with me all night and/or hook up with me." But then they probably would have walked away and asked the next person they saw blazing.my point is that assuming they were using the fact that they are women to get something for free, rather than assuming they just saw someone blazing and politely asked to partake with the sole intention of blazing and having a nice conversation, not intending to "use" anyone, is a little sexist.But wouldn't the best person to determine which one of these scenarios played out be @choda?
I'm thinking if he said "ungrateful moochers" this thread would be buried on page 3 by now.
You must be logged in to leave a comment!

Back to Forum
Oldest First
Newest First