Phish.net
Phish.net is a non-commercial project run by Phish fans and for Phish fans under the auspices of the all-volunteer, non-profit Mockingbird Foundation.
This project serves to compile, preserve, and protect encyclopedic information about Phish and their music.
Credits | Terms Of Use | DMCA
The Mockingbird Foundation
The Mockingbird Foundation is a non-profit organization founded by Phish fans in 1996 to generate charitable proceeds from the Phish community.
And since we’re entirely volunteer – with no office, salaries, or paid staff – administrative costs are less than 2% of revenues! So far, we’ve distributed over $1,000,000 to support music education for children – hundreds of grants in all 50 states, with more on the way.
@travelin_light said:
Is this true though? It would actually be a good test of some of this stuff. In some cases the older songs might be "better" than the newer (to the extent that kind of language makes sense when talking about art, music, creativity, etc.), but I doubt it's true in all cases.
Tweezer, for example -- if it never existed in the 90's, and was just debuted by Phish this year, what would you really think of it as a song? While the signature riff is catchy, there's not all that much going on musically. I actually find the song itself a little grating. But I love Tweezer, because I associate it with epic jams and because it has such a storied history and because it brings an explosion of positive energy from thousands of people all at once.
I could be wrong. And for sure songs like YEM, Divided Sky, Foam etc. represent compositional achievements that Trey largely isn't attempting anymore (and when he does, people are weirdly hostile *cough* TTE *cough*). But I suspect that at least some of the "old songs are better" bias is actually just people's brains saying "I miss the experience of being a Phish fan in the 90's" or "I wish I had gotten to be a Phish fan in the 90's".